An analysis of huntingtons opinions on the clash of civilizations

It is his use of broad concepts — language, history, religion, customs and institutions — that define and categorize these civilizations and especially religion as the most important differentiator between civilizations that is problematic. Thus, although Huntington would disagree, theoretically simple, naturally subjective and inherently problematic are arguably the best descriptions of his article. Yet, the policymaking relevance of the article is also not without critique. Indeed, and perhaps not surprisingly, Huntington disagrees with his critics who accuse him of oversimplification.

An analysis of huntingtons opinions on the clash of civilizations

How to Write a Summary of an Article? Throughout the paper the author had made numerous hypotheses that stated while nation states will remain a powerful and formidable force in the foreseeable future, it is the non-visible boundaries of civilizations that will shape the future of conflicts and forge allies as well as adversaries.

We will write a custom essay sample on Samuel P. As such, populations of each respective culture will more than likely form alliances with populations from their own civilizations and forge enemies with those they have no common ground with.

The author glazes over major historical events which had demonstrated peoples from different cultures and civilizations working together towards economic benefit such as the Silk Road.

Non-Western nations that hope to transition into modern nations form alliances with Western nations but such alliances only serve to further destroy the credibility of the elites within those non-western countries. Threats, Challenges, and Opportunities Samuel P. Hunting has shown that civilizations that are similar generally avoid conflicts in national security and economic trade while the reverse seems to only exacerbate the two.

This presents a unique opportunity for western nations to carefully examine who they consider as allies and coalition partners while also providing incentives for rethinking our security strategy of disarmament while simultaneously attempting to dissuade developing nations from increasing their arsenals.

When one begins to look at current events and policies through the lens of civilizations it becomes apparent that many of our previous alliances with those different from us had been doomed from the start as evidence by the low participation rates of countries from East Asia who only sent token forces for operations in OIF and OEF.

An analysis of huntingtons opinions on the clash of civilizations

If present conflicts dictate what future areas of concern will be, we should form stronger alliances with like minded civilizations that have already proven their dedication to our shared values such as Poland11, Georgia and former East Bloc countries that have taken similar stances against terrorism by deeds and not words.

The issues and concerns of redefining our allies along the thread of a common civilization will greatly increase the complexity of logistics in military operations due to our geographic locations as compared to those of our advesaries. For example, due to past examples of cowardice; such as negotiating with terrorist, if the US would remove South Korea as an ally it would have increased logistical challenges in dealing with North Korea and China should tensions continue to escalate.

However such friends have only proven to be costly relationships in the long lung which seldom paid dividends for services rendered unto them in their time of need.

The Western way of warfare has been one of discipline and the leveraging of technology in order to gain tactical superiority over our enemies. As such, we should look to cultivate advanced technologies with nations that share our civilizations culture and use the inherent technological innovations of these cultures to develop weapons systems that will give us the necessary edge to engage and destroy our enemies.See the book review of The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order by Robert Marks Spring Journal of World History, Vol.

11, No.1, pp Sato, Seizaburo October ‘The Clash of Civilizations: A View from Japan’, Asia Pacific Review 4, pp. The Clash of Civilizations study guide contains a biography of Horatio Alger, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

The Clash of Civilizations Summary and Analysis of Part 1, Chapters ("A World of Civilizations") Analysis. Huntington introduces his text with an anecdote. Samuel P. Huntington’s essay on the Clash of Civilization Review Samuel P. Huntington’s essay on the Clash of Civilizations can be summarized as a snapshot of the current state of political affairs of the world through the lens of western civilization.

An Analysis of Huntington's Opinions on the Clash of Civilizations PAGES WORDS 4, View Full Essay. More essays like this: the clash of civilizations. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University.

Exactly what I needed. - Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA. Summary of The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order By Samuel P. Huntington Summary written by Hollie Hendrikson, Conflict Research Consortium Citation: Huntington, Samuel P.

The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order July 20, Author: Huntington, Samuel P.

Title: The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order Publisher: New York, Simon & Schuster Inc., Main Thesis: In Samuel Huntington wrote an article for the publication.

Summary of "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order" | Beyond Intractability